Experimental Process Identification for Industrial Water De-carbonization in Power Plants

MSc. Lutfi Bina, Dr.Sc. Mile Stankovski, Dr.Sc. Goran Stojanovski, MSc. Dejan Davikovikj, Gent Bina

Abstract


Water Treatment Plant (or WTP) is the most important part of the Power Plant, because it produces vital-water it needs for steam production. Power Plants are the biggest air, ground and groundwater pollutants. Bad water quality directly impacts machine duration. Polluted water from Water Treatment Plant has a negative effect on people, flora and fauna, thus better waste management programs should be put in place to eliminate this problem. 

In this paper we are going to present the de-carbonization process of raw water as a part of water treatment plant, within coal fired power plants. De-carbonizing water is a time consuming process. We are going to present an advanced method for process identification with big time delay. The results are compared and one of the most appropriate methods is selected as identification method for this process. Further research and possibilities in this area are going to be presented by the end of the paper.

Progress in identifying the process by which we work in this paper may serve as a new way to identify highly nonlinear processes. The used algorithm for identification of the process that is outlined in this paper can be applied, and it will be the basis for the creation of the software for the application of microcomputer techniques. Here we are applying the relevant software which can be applied in the form of programming packages for identification. This has to do with passive identification methods.


Keywords


Nonlinear system identification; System with big time delay; Water Treatment Plant; Reactor; Dosing System; Flocculation; speed of sedimentation;

References


Allgöwer, F. and Zheng, A. (Eds.). (2000). Nonlinear model predictive control, progress in systems and control theory. Vol. 26. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhauser Verlag.

Auger G. (2004). The settling column and application to observe flocculation process. MSc-Thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft.

Biggs, C.A. (2000). Activated sludge flocculation: Investigating the effect of shear rate and cation concentration on flocculation dynamics. Ph.D thesis, University of Queensland, Australia.

Bina, L., Davidovikj, D, Stojanovski G., Stankovski, M. (2012a). Advanced Identification Methods for Industrial Processes with Big Time Delays. JMEA, USA, Volume 2, pp.203-207.

Camacho, E. F. and Bordons, C. (2004). Model predictive control. London, Springer.

Functional Description, Decarbonization Plant, KEK-Kosovo B, Siemens, 2010.

Francisco V., Manuel P., and Carles S., (1994). A New Procedure for Water Decarbonation Process Control, Manuel Adroer, , Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Hametner, C. and Jakubek, S. (2010). Nonlinear System Identification through Local Model. InTech.

Maciejowski, J.M. (2002). Predictive control with constraints. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Maggi, F. (2005a). Survey of the numerical characterization of 2-D clusters

Maggi, F. (2005b). Flocculation dynamics of cohesive sediment. Doctoral thesis.

“Matlab for Microsoft Windows”-User’s Guide. The Math Works inc, USA, 2009.

Stone M. and Krishnappan B.G. (2003). Floc morphology and size distributions of cohesive sediment in steady flow. Water Research 37, 2739-2747.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.21113/iir.v3i2.134

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 MSc. Lutfi Bina, Dr.Sc. Mile Stankovski, Dr.Sc. Goran Stojanovski, MSc. Dejan Davikovikj, Gent Bina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message