Does Intellectual Property Protection Bring Advantage to Innovators And Consumers? Perceptions of Kenyan Small Agro-Food Processors

Dr. Sc. Francis Okumo Omillo, LL.M. Yufunalis Okubo

Abstract


Enriching understanding of the complex relationship between intellectual property protection and local perceptions on how it benefits innovator and consumer in food value chain is an important policy effort towards food security and economic development of an agricultural society. This paper concerns intellectual property of small entrepreneurs as an intangible human capital that would spurs their ingenuity and innovation in processing foods to feed the exponentially growing population. The study sampled opinions of 132 micro and small agro-food processors in Kenya on intellectual property and its effect on developing advantageous products for them and consumers. Patent and trade secret were used as predictors of advantageous products. The two variables were modeled using linear regression techniques to find their effects on food products that would end starvation and generate enough income for the innovators (advantageous products). The study found out that the contribution of trade secrets was positive and patenting inverse to both the innovator and customer at marketplace. In the opinion of agro-food processors, intellectual property protection did not significantly influence the advantage of food products to the innovator and the end user. This implies that, small scale agro-food processors have not fully appreciated the importance of intellectual property rights. Therefore the study suggests the food processors are sensitized and current intellectual property legal framework be enhanced to promote innovation among the micro and small entrepreneurs. Borrowing from United States and China, the administration of intellectual property protection should be a one-stop-shop for policy development and enforce laws and all other intellectual proprietary matters. Interested further studies could be done on trade mark, copyrights and plant patents.


Keywords


Food processing; Intellectual Property Protection; formula protection; Patent and Advantageous Products;

References


Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont: Wadworth.

Betz, F. (2003). Managing technological innovation. Competitive advantage from change. New Jersey: Wiley.

Chen, L. (2015). The Evolution of Intellectual Property Protection in China . iBusiness, 65-73.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

FAO. (2005). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Rome: FAO.

Frankfort-Nachmais, C., & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research Methods in Social Sciences. London: Arnold.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research. An Introduction. Boston: Pearson Education.

Griset, P. (2005). The beginning of the radio communications industry. In M. J. Lynskey, & S. Yonekura, Entrepreneurship and organisation.The role of the entrepreneur in organisational innovation (pp. 61-82). New York: Oxford University Press.

Juma, C. (2006). Reinventing African Economies. Technological Innovation and the Sustainability Transition. Iowa: Iowa State University.

Kameri-Mbote, P. (2005). Intellectual Protection in Africa: An Assessment of the Status, Research and Policy Analysis on Intellectual Property Rights in Kenya. Geneva: International Environmental Law Research Centre.

Kiruki, J. K. (2015). Is Human Being a Person? Interrogating the meaning of Human Existence. Eldoret: Moi University Press.

Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology. Methods and techniques . New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

Mishra, D., & Min, J. (2010). Analyzing the relationship between dependent and independent variables in marketing: A comparison of multiple regression with path analysis. Innovative Marketing, 113-120.

Mugabe, J., Kameri-Mbote, P., & Mutta, D. (2001). Traditional Knowlege, Genetic Resources and Intellectual Property Protection: Towards a new international regime. Geneva: International Environmental Law Research Centre.

Muraguri, L., Boadi, R., & Wekesa, M. (2009). IPRs, Agriculture and Food Security. In M. Wekesa, & B. Sihanya, Intellectual Property Rights in Kenya (pp. 39-72). Nairobi: Konrad Adeneuer Stiftung and Sportslink Limited.

Odek, J. O. (2013). Situational analysis of legal and policy framework for intellectual property rights in EAC, SADC and COMESA. Unpublished.

Owuor, M. S. (2015). Integration of intellectual Property rights into regional trade agreements: Critical analysis of East African Common Market Protocol. Pretoria: Unpublished Legum Magister Thesis.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 45-77.

Piergiovanni, R., & Santarelli, E. (2006). What is the best policy for innovative entrepreneurship? In E. Santarelli, Entreprenuership, growth and innovation. The dynamics of firms and industries (pp. 261-274). New York: Springer.

Republic of Kenya. (2017). Buy Kenya-Build Kenya Strategy . Nairobi: Government Printers.

Sharma, D. K. (2014). Intellectual Property and the Need to Protect it . Indian J. Sci. Res., 084-087.

Shashikant, S. (2014). The African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation(ARIPO) protocal on patents: Implications for access to medicines. Geneva: South Center.

Sikoyo, G. M., Nyukuri, E., & Wakhungu, J. W. (2006). Intellectual Property Protection in Africa. Status of Laws, Research and Policy Analysis in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda. Nairobi: ACTS.

Stepman, F. (2013). Optimal funding and programming arrangement: Are funding opportunities adopted to value chain approaches and PP partnerships? CAAST Net Plus workshop. Addis Ababa: CAAST NET PLUS.

Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2004). Product design and development. Boston: McGrawHill Irwin.

Wekundah, J. M. (2012). A Study on Intellectual Property Environment in Eight Countries: Swaziland, Lesotho, Mozambique, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, Kenya and Ethiopia. Nairobi: African Technology Policy Studies Network.

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 197-206.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.21113/iir.v8i1.384

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Dr. Sc. Francis Okumo Omillo, LL.M. Yufunalis Okubo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message