Ethical Relativism and Morality

Dr.Sc. Demush Bajrami, MSc. Blerina Demiri

Abstract


As an egoistic nature, the human being finds it difficult to be relative to others and absolute to himself, while he is inclined to believe that others should be relative to him.

The moment we want to make a step in our life, perhaps at an early age, we face another idea, desire or belief. It is this period which proves that our beliefs are personal creations that take life when we allow ourselves to engage in the broader social circle.

The individual is unable to accomplish himself if he does not become part of the nucleus to which he belongs, where he also gets the energies needed in adapting his ego to the universal one, which is the world itself.

This paper provides in-depth analysis of what moral is in the ethical relativism: different for every human being, depending on the view point of the person affected and the conditions a person is placed in. None the less, all of these are also affected by the society, a person is born and raised in, being it the ruling norm in the family, the social interactions, traditions and customs executed, which determine the concept of moral actions to everyone.


Keywords


Ethical relativism; social custom; moral beliefs; different; individual;

References


Aloni, N., & Nihilism, B. (1991). Nietzsche’s Healing and Edifying Philosophy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

Duignan, B. (2011). Thinkers and Theories in Ethics. New York: Britannica Educational Publishing.

J. Harman; J. Thomson. (1996). Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ladd, J. (1973). Ethical Relativism. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub. Co.

Levy, N. (2004). Moralni relativizam. Zagreb: Jesenski i Turk.

Matsumoto, D. (1996). Culture and Psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks: Cole Publishing Company.

Rasmussen, K. (1931). The Netsilik Eskimo. Copenhagen: Nordisk Forlag.

Sartre, J. P. (2007). Existentialism Is a Humanism. London: Yale University Press / New Haven.

Wisnewski, J. J. (2004). A Defense of Cannibalism. Public Affairs Quarterly, 265.

Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralistic Relativism. New York: Oxford University Press.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.21113/iir.v9i1.486

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Dr.Sc. Demush Bajrami, MSc. Blerina Demiri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message