Methods Used to Deal with Peace Process Spoilers

MA. Bilbil Kastrati

Abstract


The conflicts of the past three decades have shown that the major problems which peace processes face are the spoilers. Spoilers are warring parties and their leaders who believe that peaceful settlement of disputes threatens their interests, power and their reputation; therefore, they use all means to undermine or completely spoil the process. Spoilers of peace processes can be inside or outside of the process and are characterized as limited, greedy or total spoilers. Their motives for spoiling can be different, such as: political, financial, ethnic, security, etc. Furthermore, it is important to emphasise that spoilers are not only rebels and insurgents, but can often be governments, diasporas, warlords, private military companies, etc.

In order to counteract the spoilers, the international community has adopted and implemented three methods: inducement, socialization and coercion. Often all three methods are used to convince the spoilers to negotiate, accept and implement peace agreements. Hence, this paper will examine the methods used to deal with peace process spoilers through an assessment of the strategies employed, impact, success and failures.

This paper will also argue that the success or failure of the peace process depends on the method(s) used to deal with spoilers. If the right method is chosen, with a persistent engagement of the international community, the peace process will be successful; on the contrary, if they fail to do so, the consequences will be devastating.

 


Keywords


Spoilers; Peace Process; Inducement; Socialization; Coercion;

References


Chatham House, “The Rambouillet conference on Kosovo”, Available from:

http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/International%20Affairs/Blanket%20File%20Import/inta069.pdf [Accessed 28.01.2014]

Darby J. and MacGinty R., (2003), eds. ‘‘Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Violence and Peace Processes’’, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Goodhand, J and Sedra, M., (2007) ‘‘Bribes and Bargains? Peace Conditionalities and Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Afghanistan’’, International Peacekeeping, Vol. 14, No. 1, pg 41-61.

Greenhill M. K. and Major S., (2006), ‘‘The Persil of Profiling: Civil War Spoilers and Collapse of Intrastate Peace Accords’’, International Security, Vol. 31, No. 3. pg 37.

International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect. “Preventing atrocities through post-conflict reconstruction“. Available from: http://icrtopblog.org/category/post-conflict/ [Accessed 17.01.2014]

Kaldor M., (2007), ‘‘New & Old Wars’’, Great Britani: Polity Press Cambridge, 2nd Edition.

Maier K., (2007). ‘‘Angola: Promises and Lies’’, London: Serif, 2nd Edition.

Newman E. and Richmond O., (2006), ‘‘ Peace building and spoilers’, Conflict, Security & Development, Volume 6, Issue 1, pg 101-103.

Newman E. and Richmond O., eds. (2006), ‘‘Challenges to peacebuilding: Managing spoilers during conflict resolution’’, India: United Nations University Press.

Stedman J. S., (1997), ‘‘Spoiler Problem in Peace Processes’’, International Security, Vol. 22, No. 2, pg 5-43.

United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/untac.htm [Accessed 26.01.2014]

United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/past/unamir.htm [Accessed 10.01.2014]

U.N. Peacemaker, “Peace Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Rwanda and the Rwandese Patriotic Front”. Available from: http://www.incore.ulst.ac.uk/services/cds/agreements/pdf/rwan1.pdf [Accessed 12.01.2014]

U.S. Department of State, “Dayton Accords”. Available from: http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/or/dayton/index.htm [Accessed 28.01.2014]

U.S. State Department, “Ethnic Cleansing in Kosovo: An account”. Available from: http://www.state.gov/www/global/human_rights/kosovoii/homepage.html [Accessed 24.01.2014]

U.S. Institute of Peace, “Lusaka Protocol”. Available from: http://www.usip.org/files/file/resources/collections/peace_agreements/lusaka_11151994.pdf [Accessed 28.01.2014]

U.S. Institute of Peace, “Final Act of the Paris Conference on Cambodia”. Available from: http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/file/resources/collections/peace_agreements/final_act_10231991.pdf [Accessed 26.01. 2014]

Weymouth T. and Hening S., eds. (2001), ‘The Kosovo crisis: The last American war in Europe’, UK: Biddles Ltd, Guilford and King’s Lynn.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.21113/iir.v4i1.68

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 MA. Bilbil Kastrati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
x
Message