Energy as a functional area for European integration Constantine Hadjilambrinos


policy has historically played an important role in the development of the European Union (EU). This study examines the reasons for the choice of coal and atomic energy as the bases for constructing community institutions of governance and analyzes their successes and failures as functional areas of integration.

Functionalist theory has provided the ideological foundations for the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Atomic Energy Community. Functionalist theorists advocate technocracy as the means for overcoming the conflicts inherent in traditional political processes. Coal and atomic energy were chosen as regimes of integration because of their technocratic character and the importance attached to them, respectively, as the dominant energy source of the time and the perceived source of energy abundance in the proximate future. This vision of a process of technical integration paving the way for political union was predicated on the assumption that the political and technical functions of governance could and should be separated. In fact, energy regimes could not be removed from the political context of national governance. Hard energy regimes, which include coal and atomic energy, are technocratic polities which exclude ordinary citizens from the exercise of power and intensify international conflict. Their choice as regimes of integration bestowed on the institutions of the EC a technocratic character and made it difficult for them to claim political legitimacy


European integration history, European institutions, European Coal and Steel Community, ECSC, European Atomic Energy Community, EURATOM, European Union


Ballet, A. (1956), “Aprés la vote de l'assemble sur l'Euratom,” Le Monde, July 13.

Beer, F. (1969), “Integration and disintegration in NATO: Processes of alliance cohesion and prospects for Atlantic Community”, Columbus: OH: Ohio State University Press.

Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (1999), “The European Union as a Global Actor”, London, UK: Routledge.

Bupp, I. C. and Derian, J.-C. (1978), “Light Water”, New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.

Camilleri, J. A. (1984), “The State and Nuclear Power”, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

Curtis, M. (1965), “Western European Integration”, New York, NY: Harper and Row.

CVCE [Online]. “The European Coal Organization”, available from:, [Accessed on October 10, 2020].

Duke, S. (2000), “The elusive quest for European security: from EDC to CFSP”, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

The Economist (1955), “Britain and Europe’s ‘Third Chance’”, The Economist, November 19, pp. 633-634.

Evans, D. (1979), “Western Energy Policy”, New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.

Gurrieri, S. (2014), “From the Hague Congress to the Council of Europe: hopes, achievements and disappointments in the parliamentary way to European integration (1948–51)”, Parliament, Estates and Representation, 34 (2), pp. 216-227.

Haas, E. B. (1964), “Beyond the Nation State: Functionalism and International Integration”, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hadjilambrinos, C. (2018), “The long path to European Union: A historical-institutional analysis of proposals for European integration from 800 to 1938”, ILIRIA International Review, 8 (2), pp. 123-147.

Hadjilambrinos, C. (2019), “From ECSC to European Union: An Analysis of the Evolution of the Institutions of European Integration”, ILIRIA International Review, 9 (2), pp. 209-231.

Kaplan, L. S. (1954), “NATO and its commentators: The first five years”, International Organization, 8 (4), pp. 447-467.

Küsters, H. J. (1989), “The Treaties of Rome”. In Pryce, R. (ed.), “The Dynamics of European Union”, New York, NY: Routledge.

Lucas, N. J. D. (1977), “Energy and the European Communities”, London, UK: Europa Publications.

Mitrany, D. (1966), “A working peace system”, Chicago, IL: Quadrangle Books.

Monnet, J. (1978), “Memoirs”, Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Company, Inc.

Monnet, J. (1955), “Interview”, Les Echos, special end-of-the-year issue.

Nugent, N. (1989), “The Government and Politics of the European Community”, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Palmer, M. and Lambert, J. (1968), “A handbook of European organizations”, New York, NY: Praeger.

Panke, D. and Starkmann, A. (2020), “Responding to functionalist incentives? Exploring the evolution of regional organisations after the end of the Cold War”, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 28 (2), pp. 216-235.

Paul, T. V. (2012), “Regional transformation in international relations”, in Paul, T. V., ed. “International relations theory and regional transformation”, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-46.

Polach, J. G. (1964), “EURATOM”, Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications Inc.

Schwarz, H. (1975), “Federating Europe—but How?” In Dagtoglou, P. D. (Ed.), “Basic Problems of the European Community”, Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

Sithole, K. (2013), “The Council of Europe, rights and political authority”, European Review, 21 (1), pp. 118-134.

Soutou, G-H. (2001), “France and the Cold War, 1944-63”, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12 (4), pp. 35-52.

Spierenburg, D. and Poidevin, R. (1994), “The history of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community: Supranationality in operation”, London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Tallberg, J. and Zürn, M. (2019), “The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: Introduction and framework”, Review of International Organizations, 14 (4), pp. 581-606.

Trachtenberg, M. (1999), “A Constructed Peace: The Making of the European Settlement, 1945-1963”, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Urwin, D. W. (1991), “The community of Europe: A history of European integration since 1945”, New York, NY: Longman.

Viotti, P. R. and Kauppi, M. V. (1987), “International Relations Theory”, New York, N.Y.: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Wallace, H., Wallace, W., and Webb, C. (1977), “Policy-Making in the European Communities”, New York, NY: Wiley.

Yergin, D. (2009), “The prize: The epic quest for oil, money, and power”, New York, NY: Free Press.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.21113/iir.v10i2.590

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Constantine Hadjilambrinos

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.