Activities of Intelligence Services as a Synonymous of Fear and Intimidation

  • MA. Fisnik Sadiku
  • MA. Besnik Lokaj
Keywords: intelligence services, intelligence, national security,


Intelligence services are an important factor of national security. Their main role is to collect, process, analyze, and disseminate information on threats to the state and its population.

Because of their “dark” activity, intelligence services for many ordinary citizens are synonymous of violence, fear and intimidation. This mostly comes out in theRepublicofKosovo, due to the murderous activities of the Serbian secret service in the past. Therefore, we will treat the work of intelligence services in democratic conditions, so that the reader can understand what is legitimate and legal of these services.

In different countries of the world, security challenges continue to evolve and progress every day, and to fulfil these challenges, the state needs new ways of coordinating and developing the capability to shape the national security environment. However, the increase of intelligence in many countries has raised debates about legal and ethical issues regarding intelligence activities.

Therefore, this paper will include a clear explanation of the term, meaning, process, transparency and secrecy, and the role that intelligence services have in analyzing potential threats to national security.

The study is based on a wide range of print and electronic literature, including academic and scientific literature, and other documents of various intelligence agencies of developed countries.


Abazoviç, M. (2006) Siguria Nacionale. Prishtinë. p. 50-51.

Bruqi, F. (2007) Shërbimet sekrete Serbe në Kosovë. [Online] Available from: [Accesed: 11th February 2011].

Born, H. & Wills, A. (2012) Mbikëqyrja e Shërbimeve të Inteligjencës. Democratic Control of Armed Forces – DCAF. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 08th July 2015]. p.18.

Collins, A. (no date) Studime Bashkëkohore të Sigurisë. p. 320.

Chesbro, M. (2010) Introducing Criminal Intelligence. Inside Homeland Security. p. 75.

Cohen, N. (2013) Surveillance Leaves Writers Wary. The New York Times. [Online] 11th November. p. 2. Available from: [Accessed: 09th July 2015].

DCAF – Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces. (2002) Intelligence Services and Democracy. Working Paper Series No.13. Geneva. p. 2.

Dylan, H. & Goodman, M. (2004) British Intelligence. AFIO’s Intelligencer Journal. p. 3.

Dulles, A. (2007a) Asët e Spiunazhit. Translated by Sokrat Gjerasi. p. 15.

Dulles, A. (2007b) CIA kundër KGB – arti i spiunazhit. 2nd Ed. Tiranë: Onfuri. p. 12.

France. Ministry of Defense. (no date) Directorate-General for External Security. [Online] Available from:

Federation of American Scientist - FAS. (2009) An Overview of the United States Intelligence Community for the 111th Congress. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 10th July 2015].

Friedman, L. & Hansen, V. (2012) Secrecy, Transparency and National Security. William Mitchell Law Review. 38 (5). p. 1611.

Goldman, J. (2013) Teaching About Intelligjence and Ethics. Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies, 20 (2). p. 79.

Germany. Bundesamt Für Verfassungsschutz. (no date) Welcome Page. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 07th July 2015].

Germany. Federal Ministry Of The Interior. (no date) Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 07th July 2015].

Germany. Bundesnachrichtendienst. (no date) Mission. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 07th July 2015].

Gerringer, A. & Bart, J. (2015) Law Enforcement Intelligence. Intelligencer: Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies. 21 (1). p. 75.

Great Britain. (no date) Secret Intelligence Service MI6. [Online] Available from:

Great Britain. (no date) Security Service MI5. [Online] Available from:

Hannah, G., O’brien, K., & Rathmell, A. (2005) Intelligence and Security Legislation for Security Sector Reform. Report for the United Kingdom’s Security Sector Development Advisory Team. p. 5.

Hubbard, P. (2005) Freedom of Information and Security Intelligence: An economic analysis in an Australian context. Open Government: A Journal on Freedom of Information. 1 (3). p. 9.

Hayez, P. & Regnault De Maulmin, H. (2014) French Intelligence. The AFIO’s Intelligencer Journal. p. 4.

Johnston, R. (2005) Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community. Center for the Study of Intelligence. Washington, DC, p. 16.

Johnson, L. (2006) A Framework for Strengthening U.S. Intelligence. Yale Journal of International Affairs. 1 (2). p. 120.

Knott, J. (1994) Secrecy and Intelligence in a free Society. CIA Center for the Study of Intelligence. 19 (2). [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 09th July 2015].

Laquer, W. (1985) A World of Secrets: The uses and limits of intelligence. New York: Basic Books.

Lajmpress. (no date). Mbi 60 për qind e qytetarëve mendojnë se përgjohen nga shërbimet sekrete. [Online] Available from: [Accessed: 09th July 2015].

Muscsi, A. & Minicangeli, M. (2005) Të fshehtat e Mosadit. Translated by Vladimir Bregu, Tiranë. p. 9.

Maslesha, R. (2005) Teoritë dhe Sistemet e Sigurisë. Prishtinë. p. 96-221.

Mellon, J. (2006) Të kuptuarit e shërbimeve informative. FIQ – Forumi i Iniciativës Qytetare. p. 2.

Nathan, L. (2012) Intelligence Transparency, Secrecy, and Oversight in a Democracy. Overseeing Intelligence Service: A Toolkit. p. 49.

Perry, D. (1995) Repugnant Philosophy: Ethics, Espionage, and Covert Action. The Journal of Conflict Studies. 15 (1). p. 1.

Republic of Kosovo. (2008) Law No. 03/L-063 on the Kosovo Intelligence Agency. Prishtinë. p. 3.

Republic of Albania. (no date) Albanian Intelligence Service. [Online] Available from:

Sepper, E. (no date) Democracy, Human Rights, and Intelligence Sharing. Texas International Law Journal. 46:151. p. 156-157.

Sankin, A. (2014) U.N. reports slams NSA surveillance for potential human rights violations. The Daily Dot. [Online] 17th July. p. 3. Available from: [Accessed: 09th July 2015].

Treverton, G. F. et al. (2006) Toward a Theory of Intelligence. RAND, National Security Research Division. p. 10.

United States of America. (no date) Central Intelligence Agency. [Online] Available from:

Wheaton, K. J. & Beerbower, M. T. (2006) Towards a New Definition of Intelligence. Standford Law and Policy Review. 17 (1).

Original Research Articles